Page type: Format comparison (two named formats)
Free tool: Open the calculator →
When each fits
Choose Ambrose when you want shared team shot selection and a gross or net stroke result. Choose Bingo Bango Bongo when a small group wants three hole-by-hole points for first on the green, closest to the pin and first holed, under agreed house rules.
Ambrose in brief
A team scramble where partners choose the best shot and continue from it.
Bingo Bango Bongo in brief
A three-point-per-hole game for first on the green, closest to the pin and first holed.
Table
| Comparison | Ambrose | Bingo Bango Bongo |
|---|---|---|
| One line | A team scramble where partners choose the best shot and continue from it. | A three-point-per-hole game for first on the green, closest to the pin and first holed. |
| Players | Minimum 2 players; ideal 4 players per team in a conventional event. This is a team-versus-field stroke-play arrangement, not a head-to-head match by definition; event Terms may set another team size. | Minimum: 2 players in an individual group; ideal: 2 to 4. Everyone plays their own ball, and the points are awarded to individuals rather than head-to-head sides. |
| Scoring unit | Strokes: the team records one gross score for each hole and ranks total gross or net strokes over the round, according to the event Terms. | Points per hole: one Bingo for first on the green, one Bango for closest to the pin after all balls are on the green, and one Bongo for first to hole out. Three points are available per hole; the group should agree how ties, a missed green and any unclaimed point are handled before starting. |
| Handicap method | Ambrose has no single universal handicap convention. For a four-player scramble, WHS Appendix C recommends 25% of the lowest Course Handicap plus 20% of the next, 15% of the next and 10% of the highest; for three players it recommends 30%/20%/10%, and for two players 35%/15%. Apply the allowance to unrounded Course Handicaps as the final step in calculating Playing Handicap, and have the Committee state the allowance and rounding in the Terms. These scramble recommendations are guidance for organised competitions, not proof that every Ambrose event uses them. | There is no WHS allowance specifically prescribed for this informal points game. A Colorado Golf Association article says handicapping is not necessary; it also notes that longer hitters can have an advantage in the first-on-the-green contest. If Alex, Ben, Chris and Dana want a net-score variant, the Committee or group must write its own terms rather than automatically transplanting a stroke-play or match-play percentage. WHS Appendix C says allowances are applied to unrounded Course Handicap, but its listed formats do not include Bingo Bango Bongo. |
| Money settles how | No money settlement is inherent. If players agree stakes, settle after the round from the agreed gross or net team ranking, or use a separately stated side game; record the amount, tie-break and payment rule before tee-off. | The format has no inherent stake. If the group agrees on $1 per point, total each player's points across the round and settle the difference at the end; alternatively, settle each hole's points as they are recorded. State the dollar value, tie treatment and whether a three-point sweep is doubled before teeing off. |
| Pace | Usually slower than ordinary individual stroke play when comparing the same number of players, because each team plays multiple shots from each position and then discusses which ball to select. Actual pace depends on team size, course traffic and the event's selection rules; this is an editorial tendency, not a measured fact. | Usually slower than ordinary stroke play for a small group when the group strictly preserves playing order, because players must wait for the ball farthest from the hole and track who is first to the green, closest after all balls are on, and first to hole out. A two-player group can be easier to manage; this is an editorial tendency, not a measured fact. |
| Best for | Club days, charity events and social team competitions where players want shared decisions and a forgiving team result. Four-person teams are a practical choice when the organiser wants broad participation, but the event should publish its drive minimums, shot-selection procedure, handicaps, ties and any local conditions. | A casual two-to-four-player round where different skills can win separate points and every hole stays live. It suits friends who want a simple side game without making gross score the only route to a result, provided they agree the local rules and any stake first. |
| Weakness | The name does not settle the important local details: team size, minimum drives, whether every player must contribute a selected shot, handicap formula, limits on repeated selections and tie-breaks can vary. Without written Terms, teams can apply different versions of Ambrose and dispute both fairness and pace. | The first-on-the-green point can favour longer hitters, and strict farthest-first order can slow the group or create disputes if players putt out of turn. Because this is a house game rather than a WHS format, an unagreed handicap or tie rule can change the result after play has started. |
Worked example
Illustrative inputs and selected terms, not historical results. In this explicitly selected Ambrose event, Alex's side selects a shot at each stage and records 4; Ben's side records 5. The team sizes, selected-shot procedures and gross or net contest are event terms. If Alex is first onto the green and first to hole out, while Ben is closest after all reach the green, the selected Bingo Bango Bongo rule gives Alex 2 points and Ben 1. Stakes are a separate house agreement.
Rule reference: WHS Appendix C (recommended scramble allowances and unrounded Course Handicap basis); R&A Rules of Golf Rule 3 (team and stroke-play framework; neither Ambrose nor Bingo Bango Bongo is a named standalone format)
Sources: www.usga.org , www.randa.org , www.randa.org , www.massgolf.org , www.coloradogolf.org , help.18birdies.com
Common questions
How do Ambrose and Bingo Bango Bongo score differently?
For Ambrose: Strokes: the team records one gross score for each hole and ranks total gross or net strokes over the round, according to the event Terms. For Bingo Bango Bongo: Points per hole: one Bingo for first on the green, one Bango for closest to the pin after all balls are on the green, and one Bongo for first to hole out. Three points are available per hole; the group should agree how ties, a missed green and any unclaimed point are handled before starting.
How do handicaps apply in Ambrose vs Bingo Bango Bongo?
Ambrose: Ambrose has no single universal handicap convention. For a four-player scramble, WHS Appendix C recommends 25% of the lowest Course Handicap plus 20% of the next, 15% of the next and 10% of the highest; for three players it recommends 30%/20%/10%, and for two players 35%/15%. Apply the allowance to unrounded Course Handicaps as the final step in calculating Playing Handicap, and have the Committee state the allowance and rounding in the Terms. These scramble recommendations are guidance for organised competitions, not proof that every Ambrose event uses them. Bingo Bango Bongo: There is no WHS allowance specifically prescribed for this informal points game. A Colorado Golf Association article says handicapping is not necessary; it also notes that longer hitters can have an advantage in the first-on-the-green contest. If Alex, Ben, Chris and Dana want a net-score variant, the Committee or group must write its own terms rather than automatically transplanting a stroke-play or match-play percentage. WHS Appendix C says allowances are applied to unrounded Course Handicap, but its listed formats do not include Bingo Bango Bongo.
When should I choose Ambrose instead of Bingo Bango Bongo?
Choose Ambrose when you want shared team shot selection and a gross or net stroke result. Choose Bingo Bango Bongo when a small group wants three hole-by-hole points for first on the green, closest to the pin and first holed, under agreed house rules.