Page type: Format comparison (two named formats)
Free tool: Open the calculator →
When each fits
Choose foursomes when exactly four players want a fixed two-person team match where partners share one ball, alternate shots and accept every team decision together. Choose Wolf when three or four players want rotating partnerships, hole-by-hole partner-or-solo choices and agreed points or stakes rather than a fixed side.
foursomes in brief
Partners share one ball and alternate shots, including alternating who tees off on each hole.
Wolf in brief
A rotating hole-by-hole game where the Wolf picks a partner or plays alone.
Table
| Comparison | foursomes | Wolf |
|---|---|---|
| One line | Partners share one ball and alternate shots, including alternating who tees off on each hole. | A rotating hole-by-hole game where the Wolf picks a partner or plays alone. |
| Players | Minimum: 4 for a head-to-head match (two sides of two); ideal: 4. A two-player side can also play foursomes in a stroke-play field, but two people alone cannot create a head-to-head match. | Minimum 3; ideal 4. It is a four-player group game with a temporary head-to-head or 1-v-3 side on each hole, not one fixed individual field. |
| Scoring unit | Holes in match play; total strokes in stroke play. | Holes, converted into points or agreed dollar stakes. A common convention gives each player on a winning partnered side 1 point, while a winning lone Wolf receives 2 points; losing points and ties must be agreed before play. |
| Handicap method | WHS Appendix C recommends 50% of the combined team Course Handicaps for foursomes. The allowance is applied to the unrounded Course Handicap as the final step in calculating Playing Handicap; the Committee or relevant national association sets the competition terms. Illustrative calculation: Alex 10 plus Ben 18 gives a combined 28, and 50% gives a team Playing Handicap of 14 before any competition-specific rounding or conditions. | Wolf has no WHS-listed handicap allowance. Agree the method before play and state whether each hole is treated as individual match play or four-ball match play. As a clearly labelled house-rule option, use the WHS Appendix C recommendation of 100% for individual match play and 90% for four-ball match play, applying the relevant Playing Handicaps relative to the lowest player; do not present either percentage as a universal Wolf rule. |
| Money settles how | No money settlement is part of the Rules of Golf. If stakes are agreed, partners can settle a match bet at the end of the match, or use an agreed per-hole side bet; write the house terms down before starting. | Per hole or per point, only when the group agrees the value and settlement before teeing off. A point ledger can be settled at the end of the round; lone-Wolf multipliers and ties are house rules. |
| Pace | Often faster than individual stroke play because a side plays one ball, but not guaranteed: alternating turns and partner decisions can create delays. Treat this as an editorial tendency, not a measured rule or promise. | Usually slower than ordinary stroke play for the same group, because the Wolf watches tee shots and makes a partner-or-solo decision on each hole. The extra decision-making is a tendency, not a measured timing claim. |
| Best for | Four players who want a genuine team match with shared responsibility for every shot. It suits a head-to-head contest where communication and a fixed teeing order matter as much as individual ball-striking. | Three or four players who want a strategic social game with changing sides, visible risk decisions and optional low-stakes points or money. |
| Weakness | One poor shot belongs to the side and can leave the partner an awkward next shot, so the format can feel unforgiving and less suitable when players want independent scores. | There is no single standard for handicaps, points, lone-Wolf multipliers or ties, so an unagreed rule can create disputes and uneven results. |
Worked example
Illustrative inputs and selected terms, not historical results. Alex and Ben alternate strokes at one ball and complete the hole in 4; Chris and Dana complete it in 5. The first side wins a scratch foursomes hole. For one selected Wolf house rule, Alex chooses Ben as partner and their low 4 beats Chris and Dana's low 5. Awarding +1 point to each winner and −1 to each loser at $2 per point gives net +$2, +$2, −$2 and −$2.
Rule reference: Rule 22 (Foursomes); no specific Wolf format rule; WHS Appendix C recognised-format allowances
Sources: www.randa.org , www.golfdigest.com , www.randa.org , www.usga.org
Common questions
How do foursomes and Wolf score differently?
For foursomes: Holes in match play; total strokes in stroke play. For Wolf: Holes, converted into points or agreed dollar stakes. A common convention gives each player on a winning partnered side 1 point, while a winning lone Wolf receives 2 points; losing points and ties must be agreed before play.
How do handicaps apply in foursomes vs Wolf?
foursomes: WHS Appendix C recommends 50% of the combined team Course Handicaps for foursomes. The allowance is applied to the unrounded Course Handicap as the final step in calculating Playing Handicap; the Committee or relevant national association sets the competition terms. Illustrative calculation: Alex 10 plus Ben 18 gives a combined 28, and 50% gives a team Playing Handicap of 14 before any competition-specific rounding or conditions. Wolf: Wolf has no WHS-listed handicap allowance. Agree the method before play and state whether each hole is treated as individual match play or four-ball match play. As a clearly labelled house-rule option, use the WHS Appendix C recommendation of 100% for individual match play and 90% for four-ball match play, applying the relevant Playing Handicaps relative to the lowest player; do not present either percentage as a universal Wolf rule.
When should I choose foursomes instead of Wolf?
Choose foursomes when exactly four players want a fixed two-person team match where partners share one ball, alternate shots and accept every team decision together. Choose Wolf when three or four players want rotating partnerships, hole-by-hole partner-or-solo choices and agreed points or stakes rather than a fixed side.