Page type: Format comparison (two named formats)
Free tool: Open the calculator →
When each fits
Choose Hammer when two golfers want head-to-head match play with a negotiated stake that can double, plus clear caps and carryover terms. Choose Wolf when three or four players want rotating partner-or-solo decisions, changing sides, and an agreed points or money ledger instead of one fixed match.
Hammer in brief
A match-play side game where players can call a hammer to double the current hole’s agreed stake.
Wolf in brief
A rotating hole-by-hole game where the Wolf picks a partner or plays alone.
Table
| Comparison | Hammer | Wolf |
|---|---|---|
| One line | A match-play side game where players can call a hammer to double the current hole’s agreed stake. | A rotating hole-by-hole game where the Wolf picks a partner or plays alone. |
| Players | Minimum 2; ideal 2 head-to-head or 4 as two sides. A three-player version is a house arrangement, not covered here. | Minimum 3; ideal 4. It is a four-player group game with a temporary head-to-head or 1-v-3 side on each hole, not one fixed individual field. |
| Scoring unit | The hole, with a dollar stake attached; the hole winner receives the agreed current stake. A halved hole and carryover treatment must be agreed before play. | Holes, converted into points or agreed dollar stakes. A common convention gives each player on a winning partnered side 1 point, while a winning lone Wolf receives 2 points; losing points and ties must be agreed before play. |
| Handicap method | Hammer has no separate WHS allowance. If the underlying game is individual match play, WHS Appendix C recommends 100% of each player’s unrounded Course Handicap when calculating Playing Handicap; the lowest Playing Handicap normally plays off zero and others receive the difference. For four-ball match play, Appendix C recommends 90%. Confirm the Committee or group’s Terms because Hammer is an informal overlay. | Wolf has no WHS-listed handicap allowance. Agree the method before play and state whether each hole is treated as individual match play or four-ball match play. As a clearly labelled house-rule option, use the WHS Appendix C recommendation of 100% for individual match play and 90% for four-ball match play, applying the relevant Playing Handicaps relative to the lowest player; do not present either percentage as a universal Wolf rule. |
| Money settles how | Set a base stake before teeing off, such as $1 per hole. A valid hammer doubles the current stake; agree whether it is automatic or may be declined, whether halved-hole stakes carry forward, and whether the stake resets after a won hole. Settle net amounts at the end, not by treating a casual side game as an official Rules competition. | Per hole or per point, only when the group agrees the value and settlement before teeing off. A point ledger can be settled at the end of the round; lone-Wolf multipliers and ties are house rules. |
| Pace | Usually the same as match play or slower than ordinary stroke play, as each hole still uses match-play scoring but calling, accepting and recording doubles adds decisions. This is an editorial tendency, not a measured timing claim. | Usually slower than ordinary stroke play for the same group, because the Wolf watches tee shots and makes a partner-or-solo decision on each hole. The extra decision-making is a tendency, not a measured timing claim. |
| Best for | Two golfers who want head-to-head match play with a negotiated money side game, or four golfers already comfortable with two-sided match play and clear pre-round limits. It suits players who enjoy risk decisions and can keep the stake modest. | Three or four players who want a strategic social game with changing sides, visible risk decisions and optional low-stakes points or money. |
| Weakness | The stake can escalate quickly, and unclear choices about acceptance, carryovers, timing, concessions or four-ball sides can create arguments. The group must agree a cap or stop rule if players do not want an unexpected liability. | There is no single standard for handicaps, points, lone-Wolf multipliers or ties, so an unagreed rule can create disputes and uneven results. |
Worked example
Illustrative inputs and selected terms, not historical results. For an accepted single hammer on an agreed $2 hole stake, the stake becomes $4. If Alex wins the hole, Ben pays Alex $4 under that expressly chosen house rule. For one selected Wolf house rule, Alex chooses Ben as partner and their low 4 beats Chris and Dana's low 5. Awarding +1 point to each winner and −1 to each loser at $2 per point gives net +$2, +$2, −$2 and −$2.
Rule reference: No specific Rules of Golf rule governs either informal game. R&A Rule 3.1–3.2 describes the underlying match-play concepts; WHS Appendix C lists allowances for recognised formats, not Hammer or Wolf.
Sources: www.golfdigest.com , www.golfdigest.com , www.randa.org , www.usga.org
Common questions
How do Hammer and Wolf score differently?
For Hammer: The hole, with a dollar stake attached; the hole winner receives the agreed current stake. A halved hole and carryover treatment must be agreed before play. For Wolf: Holes, converted into points or agreed dollar stakes. A common convention gives each player on a winning partnered side 1 point, while a winning lone Wolf receives 2 points; losing points and ties must be agreed before play.
How do handicaps apply in Hammer vs Wolf?
Hammer: Hammer has no separate WHS allowance. If the underlying game is individual match play, WHS Appendix C recommends 100% of each player’s unrounded Course Handicap when calculating Playing Handicap; the lowest Playing Handicap normally plays off zero and others receive the difference. For four-ball match play, Appendix C recommends 90%. Confirm the Committee or group’s Terms because Hammer is an informal overlay. Wolf: Wolf has no WHS-listed handicap allowance. Agree the method before play and state whether each hole is treated as individual match play or four-ball match play. As a clearly labelled house-rule option, use the WHS Appendix C recommendation of 100% for individual match play and 90% for four-ball match play, applying the relevant Playing Handicaps relative to the lowest player; do not present either percentage as a universal Wolf rule.
When should I choose Hammer instead of Wolf?
Choose Hammer when two golfers want head-to-head match play with a negotiated stake that can double, plus clear caps and carryover terms. Choose Wolf when three or four players want rotating partner-or-solo decisions, changing sides, and an agreed points or money ledger instead of one fixed match.